Well I admit the header is a bold statement;however I have my reasons for the statement.
Fran Rogier claims to have rescued a mutt,(BRINDI) from a shelter ,(and I use the term shelter quite loosely). Fran claims that Brindi was in good health,(could be true) but who knows? After Fran rescued Brindi it went down hill from there,dog not Lic.,dog running at large,dog attacking other dogs at least 4 times and God knows what else that never was reported.
The final result that time Brindi was seized,and ordered to be put down,well Shit For Brains,desided to hire a lawyer and fight it.She claims to have paid a piss pot full of money to the lawyer,well at least half of the lawyers bill,the lawyer was forced to sue for the other half,and now has a lien on her shack. At a later date,Fran Rogier was charged with 3 counts under HRM by laws consurning her beloved Brindi.
Rogier was found guilty on all 3 counts,and Brindi was to be returned to SFB,under strict conditions,the main one was to be muzzled while off SFB's property;well after 2 months there was a "terrible accident",(Fran's words) and Brindi attacked a small dog on a leash,on a public highway,being walked by a pregnant lady,and her husband. Why did Brindi attack? you ask,because SFB Failed to have a muzzle on as ordered by the court.Oh yes Brindi escaped because SFB couldn't operate power windows.....Now that is one lame excuse,yep I know hard to believe but read the tapes in this blog and see for yourself. Than SFB filed a false complaint with the Police and got caught with her pants down as the call was taped,tape on this blog as well.
Well since SFB broke the court order, it left the police and By law no choice than to seize Brindi again, oh yes SFB's tried to hide in her shack,refused to answer the door until enough was enough and the police forced their way in to her shack. Brindi was seized,and placed in a pound,where she has now been over a year while SFB,twitters away,yaps on facebook and just wastes internet space with her BS.
Now brindi is in jail,so to speak,however instead of trying to do right by brindi,SFB's is trying to ,(no not trying but is) making a bigger arse of herself,by trying to shut our tourist industry down,tearing a strip off the mayor whenever she wants,saying our,(CANADIAN) legal system sucks,that animal welfare groups in Canada are doing a piss poor job,in fact tearing a strip off our legal system and Gov. whenever the mood strikes her; all this from a guest of Canada.
Now SFB's has turned so many people off that could and would help her,that she has lost at least 90% of the support that she has in NS and Canada,oh but wait she has a lot of support from the middle east,south africa,the south pole and 4 corners of the world, a fat lot of good that will do her except to boost her paypal account..SHE A LEACH, BOTTOM FEEDER!
Bottom line its all about Fran Rogier,AKA SFB"s,she loves the lime light,and could care less about Brindi,oh BTY Vet visit today cost 200 bucks....Send me the money!!
Maybe Miss Priss in South Africa will send it to her. Personally I would love to drive SFB's to the USA border and give her 200 sift kicks in her fat ass.
I will add much more as time allows,just to get the truth out there.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Lord she hates when you print the truth.
ReplyDeleteIt is never her fault. In her opinion, people have no reason to walk their dog on a public road past her house. Remember she can't seem to figure out where her property line ends and the public road begins. LMFAO
Kinda hard to believe she almost PHD!
Right, Clara--cracked me up when I heard her answer to Michele, the HRM Dispatch operator whom she called the night Brindi hurled herself out of Fran's car & attacked a smaller dog being walked on a leash by her owners down the public road. Michele (assuming that not even an IDIOT would let the same thing happen (counting the unreporteds) for about the 7th time) said "But the other dog came on your property, right." and Fran said "Well it depends on how you define 'property.'"
ReplyDeleteI dunno where they define the public road as the private property of the person whose house it runs past. Did they do that back in Kentucky? It's a pretty backwards state in lots of ways--but I don't think so -- not even there.
I can define property...in this case land,normally there should be survey stakes marking boundry lines,which are located 33 feet from the center line of a public highway,so if there is a ditch in front of Fran's shack,or her property abuts the highway,its public property 33 feet from the center line,so fran is full of shit with the statement,"Well it depends on how you define 'property.'"
ReplyDeleteWTF is she that stupid.
Now accoprding to her twitter,facebook group,she realizes she will lose in court,and is prepared to appeal,well in Canada,to appeal there HAS to be an error in LAW,not because SFB is not satisfied with the decision ....Good luck on that one....LMAO
LMAO
ReplyDelete