Well here is the latest comment that the idiots sent: """"""AnonymousApr 23, 2012 08:07 AM
Thanks for admitting you made complaints to HRM yet you don't live there. Total fraud. So is the email from Riley. Ever heard of message headers? Your typing exercise proves absolutely nothing. Anybody can type. It's called libel. Good crimes.
As for your crap about your "hubby's auntie" Emma Richards, your English is so bad, anybody can recognize it. Thanks for confirming that you hate Francesca because she's American. That's great proof of hating somebody just because of where they come from. Hate crimes.
Threatening about immigration puts you in the same boat, Wayne. Fraud plus intimidation. Keep the evidence coming, morons, can't wait till it's your turn in the dock. This whole blog is just perfect for that.
What about threatening her for "impersonating" the Queen? That was hilarious! Keep at it.
I laugh so hard that you still don't know who I am. You oughta know you have so many enemies from way back, buddy."""""""
I posted the comment,but thought I would just put it up as a topic as well, of course the idiot would not use their name probably to hide just how stupid they actually are.This want to be lawyer needs a lesson in CANADIAN LAW,Fraud,hate crimes,threatening,well the author of that comment better look in the mirror as it seems that the threats are not made by this blogger but by some of fran's Idiot friends or in many cases by Fran herself. Yes several of us have called HRM,Immigration,CRA,and the IRS,in fact all of the Gov depts have hot lines for reporting suspected violations maybe the writer of the comment should actually look it up before blowing smoke out their ass.
Monday, April 23, 2012
Friday, April 20, 2012
THE WAY TO BE ACCEPTED IN A NEW COMMUNITY.... NOT
Well as most everyone knows Ms.Rogier lives in Nova Scotia as a guest of the Canadian Government,and wishes to live there as a landed immigrant and I suspect would like to fit in to the community which she claims to like....well now wait a minute Ms Rogier posted this on her Face book page.
""Francesca Rogier People really need to understand just how dysfunctional the whole place is. It's not saying that I'm perfect in every way, in any way. But dysfunction and corruption cannot be escaped at these levels.""
Now I can't speak for anyone else but if I wanted to move to a new country, I would not pick an area as Frannie describes,and if I did I would not make statements like the above on a public chat page which will just turn off the people of this great Province. IMO its not the way to fit into a community. Than there is the issue that Ms Rogier will not live by the laws of the community even when under a court order, and she thinks its us the residents of NS that are dysfunctional? I suggest Rogier looks into a mirror.
Monday, April 9, 2012
Never fails.
Never fails. She gets out of paying for boarding the windows the HRM had to do because she would not stay out of the house.
Wednesday, April 4, 2012
A message sent to a friend of this blog.
This appears to be an attempt to scare the people who do not agree with Ms Rogier.
""Robert Riley
Message for you Wayne.
http://wwwbologgerch.blogspot.ca/
D O G L O V E R
wwwbologgerch.blogspot.com
A group that can now be revealed as haters relentlessly targeting individuals on facebook, twitter, blogger, and especially the DOG LOVER blog: wwwbologgerca.blogspot.com since 2009. KARMA IS A BITCH!
Now this was sent to Wayne by Robert Riley, we all know RR,remember he the guy, (witness)that fell from the sky and has eyes in the back of his head,at least he did the night Brindi attacked a smaller dog.
Oh but hang on the plot thickens,RR sent the link to Wayne....But now did he?....OH Hell NO it came from Fran's I will disclose how I know that for a fact in due course. Now something else that was noticed was the Blog was created by Fran herself,just as she created Humane Halifax,save Brindi,and countless other blogs and FB groups,to say nothing of twitter accounts Hell most of her crap is on this blog.
I am putting this out there just to show everyone that Ms Rogier is a user,Hell Rogier even called Robert Riley a drunk who couldn't be trusted its all in one of the tapes where she called HRM dispatch,well that probably is the case and if in fact it is the case; Why would Fran still associate with the likes?...... Yep you got it to use him for personal gain.
Further if one looks at the members in her open FBG one may discover that at least 3/4 of the members couldn't find Nova Scotia on a map let alone HRM Further the vast majority of members couldn't give a rats ass about Fran or Brindi, another classic example of people being used for personal gain,and just maybe a few of her suckers will donate to her paypal account.
To sum up its my opinion that Fran is just using Brindi as a meal ticket,as its no longer about the dog but Ms Rogier herself.Once brindi is hopefully re homed Rogier will have to have another cause to raise money,hopefully people won't be to gullable to be sucked in yet again.
""Robert Riley
Message for you Wayne.
http://wwwbologgerch.blogspot.ca/
D O G L O V E R
wwwbologgerch.blogspot.com
A group that can now be revealed as haters relentlessly targeting individuals on facebook, twitter, blogger, and especially the DOG LOVER blog: wwwbologgerca.blogspot.com since 2009. KARMA IS A BITCH!
Now this was sent to Wayne by Robert Riley, we all know RR,remember he the guy, (witness)that fell from the sky and has eyes in the back of his head,at least he did the night Brindi attacked a smaller dog.
Oh but hang on the plot thickens,RR sent the link to Wayne....But now did he?....OH Hell NO it came from Fran's I will disclose how I know that for a fact in due course. Now something else that was noticed was the Blog was created by Fran herself,just as she created Humane Halifax,save Brindi,and countless other blogs and FB groups,to say nothing of twitter accounts Hell most of her crap is on this blog.
I am putting this out there just to show everyone that Ms Rogier is a user,Hell Rogier even called Robert Riley a drunk who couldn't be trusted its all in one of the tapes where she called HRM dispatch,well that probably is the case and if in fact it is the case; Why would Fran still associate with the likes?...... Yep you got it to use him for personal gain.
Further if one looks at the members in her open FBG one may discover that at least 3/4 of the members couldn't find Nova Scotia on a map let alone HRM Further the vast majority of members couldn't give a rats ass about Fran or Brindi, another classic example of people being used for personal gain,and just maybe a few of her suckers will donate to her paypal account.
To sum up its my opinion that Fran is just using Brindi as a meal ticket,as its no longer about the dog but Ms Rogier herself.Once brindi is hopefully re homed Rogier will have to have another cause to raise money,hopefully people won't be to gullable to be sucked in yet again.
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Message from Francesca impersonating the Queen!
Uploaded by franyafranya on Apr 2, 2012
A message from Queen Elizabeth, who, as we know, adores dogs, respectfully dubbed. The Queen (sort of) speaks on behalf of Brindi, a dog targeted for death for no good reason by Halifax, Nova Scotia. Admittedly, Brindi does on occasion have issues with dogs approaching her property. However, it is by no means all dogs. And (unlike, ahem, one or two of Princess Anne's dogs, dare one mention), Brindi has never, ever, bitten a child or an adult. Nor has she ever inflicted anything worse more than a few tiny "spots" (direct quote from dog owner) on another dog. She has what is called "good bite inhibition". And because of that, and the fact that her excellent trainer stands behind her and her guardian, Francesca Rogier, she should be freed and given the same tolerance and understanding Halifax animal control gives to scores of other dogs who have committed worse transgressions! But it does not look very good at the moment, hence the need to solicit help from higher powers - the highest in the land!
We would have much preferred the brilliant Queen record something original, but we understand she's a bit busy. We feel strongly that, if accurately informed about this case, she'll gladly forgive our audacity. After all, it is April 1. Beyond that, Brindi and Francesca Rogier deserve the Crown's best boost!
Yet you loaded, your latest drivel up on April the second!
"Man's inhumanity to man is heartbreaking, but man's inumanity to animals is soul destroying. Let us ask for the strength and courage to right wrongs on their behalf." Rosemary Bond
Court case - being heard by Judge Flora Buchan in the Dartmouth Provincial Court, "Crown" attorney Katherine Salsman (who has definitely not consulted Her Royal Highness to obtain her wishes, let alone act on them). Meant to end March 16; (possible) decision May 10, unclear how it will go.
A message from Queen Elizabeth, who, as we know, adores dogs, respectfully dubbed. The Queen (sort of) speaks on behalf of Brindi, a dog targeted for death for no good reason by Halifax, Nova Scotia. Admittedly, Brindi does on occasion have issues with dogs approaching her property. However, it is by no means all dogs. And (unlike, ahem, one or two of Princess Anne's dogs, dare one mention), Brindi has never, ever, bitten a child or an adult. Nor has she ever inflicted anything worse more than a few tiny "spots" (direct quote from dog owner) on another dog. She has what is called "good bite inhibition". And because of that, and the fact that her excellent trainer stands behind her and her guardian, Francesca Rogier, she should be freed and given the same tolerance and understanding Halifax animal control gives to scores of other dogs who have committed worse transgressions! But it does not look very good at the moment, hence the need to solicit help from higher powers - the highest in the land!
We would have much preferred the brilliant Queen record something original, but we understand she's a bit busy. We feel strongly that, if accurately informed about this case, she'll gladly forgive our audacity. After all, it is April 1. Beyond that, Brindi and Francesca Rogier deserve the Crown's best boost!
Yet you loaded, your latest drivel up on April the second!
"Man's inhumanity to man is heartbreaking, but man's inumanity to animals is soul destroying. Let us ask for the strength and courage to right wrongs on their behalf." Rosemary Bond
Court case - being heard by Judge Flora Buchan in the Dartmouth Provincial Court, "Crown" attorney Katherine Salsman (who has definitely not consulted Her Royal Highness to obtain her wishes, let alone act on them). Meant to end March 16; (possible) decision May 10, unclear how it will go.
Francesca Rogier, it is against the law, to impersonate the Queen!, We have your full video and will be turning that over to the law. You might still think your so smart, you can get away with anything, but this time you went too far.
I hope and pray, you! ("not poor Brindi") goes to jail over this one!!!
I am once again disgusted by your behavior!
Let Brindi Live, turn her over to some people who truly love her, or can do, given a chance.
Madam Rogier, I told you this before and I will tell you this again. You ma'am, are an idiot if you think you can get away with this!
Latest drivel and or attempt by Francesca to get back at the people who currently have Brindi in their kennel.
Francesca Rogier
BRINDI HEALTH NEWS: The vet called this morning with troubling news about Brindi's blood test result for the pancreatic enzyme level. It's back up again, to 30% above normal. She went over the situation with me in detail. Only two months ago the level was normal (Jan. 24). Yet a month before, it was elevated 30% above normal, for some time. HRM and the kennel are not reporting any pancreatitis symptoms (attacks of diarrhea, vomiting), nor did they report any back then. This makes no sense for a dog with a history of chronic pancreatitis.
When did Brindi develop this history of a chronic pancreatic disease? I did notice with some interest, since you brought the subject up (again) trying to convince others, the current care takers are responsible, that, judging from the pictures you yourself have posted up, while Brindi was in your care, Brindi was already overweight. So coming to that, what did you feed her?
Almost always, the increased enzyme level is accompanied by symptoms. Our vets did the ultrasound to rule out the only other likely cause of the enzyme level increase, i.e., some kind of "mass" (a tumor or thickening). The level went down a month later, but now it's up again.
In one of your other posts, you mentioned again that Brindi had a tumor, so how come the vet did not do a biopsy? You appear to come off at ("poor") Brindi being sick a lot.
And again, the vets cannot figure out why the level shot up. It just doesn't make sense. Sure, there could be some cause they don't know about yet in veterinary medicine - but evidently there aren't any statistics or studies to compare it to, so it would be a pretty big anomaly.
They do know that Brindi had symptoms of pancreatitis in September, because the HRM vet documented them in a letter. And the same letter referred to previous attacks she had over the summer, which HRM didn't report at the time. Put that all together with the lack of a readily available explanation for her weight loss of around two pounds since January, and you have to ask, what is going on here, if she didn't have diarrhea or vomiting (which would explain weight loss)???!
Wow, two whole pounds of weight-loss for a dog that was already overweight is/means getting her back on the right track. You, Madam, are an idiot for trying to make that look different!
As to, what could have caused the weight loss, a more healthy diet, in combination with some healthy exercise, perhaps?
Are HRM and/or the kennel are being truthful? Are they overlooking something? The vet is really frustrated. She pointed out to me that of course, a dog owner would be able to notice subtle changes and report on a dog's health in a lot more detail than a kennel. That frustrates the heck out of me, as you can imagine.
Have you ever been truthful? You, Madam, are a liar, and that frustrates the heck out of all of us, as you can imagine.
At my request, she's looking into a new therapy for stem cell stimulation that Lana Horan recommended. I hope she can start on that soon. It's called StemEnhance. I bought several bottles in 2010 and had just started Brindi on it with the same idea, when HRM took her again. In the meantime, Brindi can't go back on normal (tastier) food or have treats until the enzyme level gets back to normal. That's also frustrating, because she's been on low fat, reduced calorie food for at least half a year now.
They forgot to take photos last week, with all this coming up. I know we'd all like to see some; thanks to those who asked. Hopefully next time...!
Interesting. Why did you want to start this StemEnhance? Since you claim, you wanted to put Brindi on that long before she got into the kennel she is now in? Because you knew, you were feeding her wrong, too many table scraps, perhaps? Just asking.
ME: No way to account for enzymes going back up, even checking Vet Texts from Roman Times to the Present, SO
It MUST be something They are going, not doing, feeding, not feeding at the kennel. "Are HRM and/or the kennel are being truthful?" NOTE: she didn't say they are LYING; just innocently inquiring if they are being truthful.
Must be something they are doing? Feeding, not feeding? Do you even know what you are talking about? I think not, in your distorted mind, all you can think of is blaming the people who are currently taking (very good) care of Brindi.
I am beginning to wonder if you care about that poor animal at all!
Francesca Rogier, you and you alone, have placed this poor dog on death row, twice! You have failed to show up in court on time, every singly time you had to!
You, and you alone, have also refused poor Brindi of a life, since the court offered you twice already to re-home Brindi; something you refused, knowing very well you have been and still are, using her and playing with her life!
BRINDI HEALTH NEWS: The vet called this morning with troubling news about Brindi's blood test result for the pancreatic enzyme level. It's back up again, to 30% above normal. She went over the situation with me in detail. Only two months ago the level was normal (Jan. 24). Yet a month before, it was elevated 30% above normal, for some time. HRM and the kennel are not reporting any pancreatitis symptoms (attacks of diarrhea, vomiting), nor did they report any back then. This makes no sense for a dog with a history of chronic pancreatitis.
When did Brindi develop this history of a chronic pancreatic disease? I did notice with some interest, since you brought the subject up (again) trying to convince others, the current care takers are responsible, that, judging from the pictures you yourself have posted up, while Brindi was in your care, Brindi was already overweight. So coming to that, what did you feed her?
Almost always, the increased enzyme level is accompanied by symptoms. Our vets did the ultrasound to rule out the only other likely cause of the enzyme level increase, i.e., some kind of "mass" (a tumor or thickening). The level went down a month later, but now it's up again.
In one of your other posts, you mentioned again that Brindi had a tumor, so how come the vet did not do a biopsy? You appear to come off at ("poor") Brindi being sick a lot.
And again, the vets cannot figure out why the level shot up. It just doesn't make sense. Sure, there could be some cause they don't know about yet in veterinary medicine - but evidently there aren't any statistics or studies to compare it to, so it would be a pretty big anomaly.
There have, in fact, been a lot of studies done about this subject!
They do know that Brindi had symptoms of pancreatitis in September, because the HRM vet documented them in a letter. And the same letter referred to previous attacks she had over the summer, which HRM didn't report at the time. Put that all together with the lack of a readily available explanation for her weight loss of around two pounds since January, and you have to ask, what is going on here, if she didn't have diarrhea or vomiting (which would explain weight loss)???!
Wow, two whole pounds of weight-loss for a dog that was already overweight is/means getting her back on the right track. You, Madam, are an idiot for trying to make that look different!
As to, what could have caused the weight loss, a more healthy diet, in combination with some healthy exercise, perhaps?
Are HRM and/or the kennel are being truthful? Are they overlooking something? The vet is really frustrated. She pointed out to me that of course, a dog owner would be able to notice subtle changes and report on a dog's health in a lot more detail than a kennel. That frustrates the heck out of me, as you can imagine.
Have you ever been truthful? You, Madam, are a liar, and that frustrates the heck out of all of us, as you can imagine.
At my request, she's looking into a new therapy for stem cell stimulation that Lana Horan recommended. I hope she can start on that soon. It's called StemEnhance. I bought several bottles in 2010 and had just started Brindi on it with the same idea, when HRM took her again. In the meantime, Brindi can't go back on normal (tastier) food or have treats until the enzyme level gets back to normal. That's also frustrating, because she's been on low fat, reduced calorie food for at least half a year now.
They forgot to take photos last week, with all this coming up. I know we'd all like to see some; thanks to those who asked. Hopefully next time...!
Interesting. Why did you want to start this StemEnhance? Since you claim, you wanted to put Brindi on that long before she got into the kennel she is now in? Because you knew, you were feeding her wrong, too many table scraps, perhaps? Just asking.
ME: No way to account for enzymes going back up, even checking Vet Texts from Roman Times to the Present, SO
It MUST be something They are going, not doing, feeding, not feeding at the kennel. "Are HRM and/or the kennel are being truthful?" NOTE: she didn't say they are LYING; just innocently inquiring if they are being truthful.
Must be something they are doing? Feeding, not feeding? Do you even know what you are talking about? I think not, in your distorted mind, all you can think of is blaming the people who are currently taking (very good) care of Brindi.
Francesca Rogier, you and you alone, have placed this poor dog on death row, twice! You have failed to show up in court on time, every singly time you had to!
You, and you alone, have also refused poor Brindi of a life, since the court offered you twice already to re-home Brindi; something you refused, knowing very well you have been and still are, using her and playing with her life!
As if ANOTHER Brindi blog is needed.
http://www.brindijustice.com/brindi/#/introOne
THE CALLS TO DISPATCH
Michelle Steen worked at HRM dispatch. She first spoke to Francesca Rogier during the afternoon of Saturday, July 26, 2008. At the time, Francesca was acting on instruction from Scott Hughes at HRM Legal Services (through her lawyer, David Green, to ask for an animal control officer to come to the pound so that she could visit her dog, Brindi. HRM had seized the dog days earlier. Michelle relayed the request in to Animal Services, and invited the concerned dog owner to stay on the line while she waited for a response. They ended up speaking for 45 minutes, during which Michelle checked the animal control reports on Brindi.
As she later testified in court, the four-year veteran dispatcher told Francesca she didn't understand why Brindi was seized, as nothing in the report warranted it. She told Francesca she felt badly and wanted to help her. When Animal Services refused to the visit request, Michelle invited Francesca to call her whenever she was on duty. She assured Francesca that the dispatch calls were never recorded.
Meanwhile, Animal Services continued to deny Francesca access to her dog for the better part of two years, although there is no by-law or policy forbidding it. During that period, the two women spoke a number of times, when Michelle was on night duty. They never met. They only spoke about Brindi and animal control. The dispatcher volunteered whatever information she had about the case.
On September 14, 2010, a mishap occurred between Brindi and another dog. The other dog owners, Katie and Tyson Simms told Francesca their dog was okay, but they vowed to call HRM anyway. (They did not mention that Katie's maiden name was Pettipas.) As Katie later testified, when Francesca begged her not to do it, because HRM would do anything to have Brindi killed, the woman yelled out, "I don't give a f--- about anybody else's dog but my own!" In a state of panic, Francesca thought of calling Michelle, who turned out to be on duty that night. No report had come in, but they spoke at length. Francesca phoned back to check again around 1 am, and again on Sept. 16, 2010.
Sunday, April 1, 2012
This is as dumb as a fence post::
I see that Ms Rogier has a PUBLIC PROFILE and I found the following there!
""
****PRIVACY NOTICE:
Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States or Canadian Federal Governments also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photo's or any other "pcture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.""""
Well I hate to inform Fran Rogier but her profile is open for the entire world to see,I fail to see where any of her crap she prints is copy right material. IF she doesn't want anything copied, commented on she has 2 choices either STFU or make everything private. Until such time she does one of the above its fair game.
""
****PRIVACY NOTICE:
Warning--any person and/or institution and/or Agent and/or Agency of any governmental structure including but not limited to the United States or Canadian Federal Governments also using or monitoring/using this website or any of its associated websites, you do NOT have my permission to utilize any of my profile information nor any of the content contained herein including, but not limited to my photos, and/ or the comments made about my photo's or any other "pcture" art posted on my profile. You are hereby notified that you are strictly prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, disseminating, or taking any other action against me with regard to this profile and the contents herein. The foregoing prohibitions also apply to your employee(s), agent(s), student(s) or any personnel under your direction or control. The contents of this profile are private and legally privileged and confidential information, and the violation of my personal privacy is punishable by law.""""
Well I hate to inform Fran Rogier but her profile is open for the entire world to see,I fail to see where any of her crap she prints is copy right material. IF she doesn't want anything copied, commented on she has 2 choices either STFU or make everything private. Until such time she does one of the above its fair game.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)